Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:13:03 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Subject: Re: security/nmap & gcc3.3? Message-ID: <401914EF.5000101@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <m33c9yq2h4.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <1E5E3622-51D2-11D8-96D6-003065A20588@mac.com> <40186515.9080001@fillmore-labs.com> <m33c9yq2h4.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Andree wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> writes: > > >>>[ Other ports I've tried which use g++33 link fine; this problem seems >>>specific to security/nmap... ] >> >>I try to look into this over the weekend, or do you have a patch? > > > One notable difference between gcc 2.95 and 3.3 is that gcc 3.3 does > proper namespaces and all the standard stuff is now in the "std" name > space, while it was not split out into its own namespace in gcc 2.95. > > Spraying some "using namespace std;" over the code may fix this. (No, I > haven't tested that.) Can't find my standard namespace spray can right now...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?401914EF.5000101>