From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Aug 7 1:41:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD70537B405 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3348A43EFA for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:40:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g778ekpN018385; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:40:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with UUCP id g778ekwX018384; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:40:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from grimreaper.grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g777Qt1p003576; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:26:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org) Message-Id: <200208070726.g777Qt1p003576@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Terry Lambert Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSL vs. -lmd References: <3D49E41D.57DBF81C@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <3D49E41D.57DBF81C@mindspring.com> ; from Terry Lambert "Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:45:01 PDT." Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 08:26:55 +0100 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If there's a port for it. > > ports/security/openssl/Makefile: > PORTVERSION= 0.9.6e > > ...not very happening, if I need an app_verify_callback() that > actually passes the user's void * parameter like it's supposed > to, AES CFB or OFB or CTR, RFC2256 compliance for object > definitions, IBM 4758 crypto card support, or want Theo de Raadt's > security patch for ui_openssl.c, or want X.509 mandatory extension > handling or CRL checking, or use PKCS#7 with S/MIME, etc.. That > (and a lot more) all requires that I use 0.9.7. Please submit your port for 0.9.7-beta. > > I wonder, why you are not complaining about us having -lc in the base system > > :-) After all, with Linux systems you usually have a choice -- glibc/libc/etc. > > I'll complain about the resolver being in libc, if that'll make > you happy... it'll make everyone who has to do name lookups > serially so they compalin about IPv6 in Mozilla happy... 8-). Erm, complaining is the slow way to solve this. Please rather submit patches. M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message