Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:07:46 -0800 From: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@jaxon.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, jedgar@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Serious problems with the wdm port Message-ID: <20000315190746.A9758@norn.ca.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003151846390.30224-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:52:22PM -0800 References: <20000315173129.A5272@norn.ca.eu.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003151846390.30224-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:52:22PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > The only reason I found this was because the modules I'd listed in
> > /etc/pam.conf (the RIGHT place) weren't even being used.
>
> Nice spotting. So this looks like a general problem with the port - but am
> I right that since it doesn't actually modify the pam config on FreeBSD
> it's not directly a problem for us (only if someone copies the default?)
Well, if you have USE_PAM it does install this to /etc/pam.d by default
and uses those options.
-Chris
--
cpiazza@jaxon.net cpiazza@FreeBSD.org
Abbotsford, BC, Canada
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000315190746.A9758>