From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 18 17: 2:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.netcologne.de (mail2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DB837B56E; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:02:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from van.woerkom@netcologne.de) Received: from oranje.my.domain (dial-195-14-250-77.netcologne.de [195.14.250.77]) by mail2.netcologne.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA25644; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 02:02:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from marc@localhost) by oranje.my.domain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA03596; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 02:01:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from van.woerkom@netcologne.de) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 02:01:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200006190001.CAA03596@oranje.my.domain> X-Authentication-Warning: oranje.my.domain: marc set sender to van.woerkom@netcologne.de using -f From: Marc van Woerkom To: grog@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <20000618160223.A2482@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> (message from Greg Lehey on Sun, 18 Jun 2000 16:02:23 -0700) Subject: Re: -e option to umount? Reply-To: van.woerkom@netcologne.de References: <20000618160223.A2482@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > What do people think about adding a -e option to umount(8) to eject a > removable medium where possible? SGIs and SUNs use an 'eject' command for CDs and DAT tapes. Here are the manpages for comparison: Irix 6.5: http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=0650&db=man&fname=/usr/share/catman/u_man/cat1/eject.z&srch=eject Solaris 2.7: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=eject&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=SunOS+5.7&format=html Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message