From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 9 21:10:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBD316A407 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC7343CB5 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:09:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so932812uge for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:10:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=j8UraCCy8yN904irjjKC2uYZvN0zbZPonPyUfAg9Rif1fK2UMRT/qdxhM2vrj8mHKJu3iU1Yldvfa94dxZGD+tqYw9RvQnTuceuAa3JQWKcrrzG5+CPYVla27ITut/vOzF7SzY3Trb8OvEcqMFPA2qq9h8Pm6Zw2ARUh/jqYm9E= Received: by 10.78.127.3 with SMTP id z3mr515455huc.1165698643018; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:10:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:10:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:10:42 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Robert Watson" In-Reply-To: <20061209204924.N9926@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <52944.192.168.1.110.1165679313.squirrel@yal.hopto.org> <20061209195519.B60055@mp2.macomnet.net> <20061209204924.N9926@fledge.watson.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cb7ae0f50bb320ae Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, yal Subject: Re: CURRENT freezes on Laitude D520 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 21:10:53 -0000 On 12/9/06, Robert Watson wrote: > While this may be useful in doing some initial debugging and working around > the problem, I'd really appreciate it if people didn't run with > debug.mpsafenet="0" for any extended period, as it masks bugs rather than > fixing them, and results in them not getting fixed. It also leads to a > significant performance hit, and we really don't want people running with > debugging features like this turned on by default; I'd rather they used the > cycles on INVARIANTS and WITNESS. Do we have to forget about IPSEC+IPv6?