Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:27:47 -0800
From:      Niklas Enbom <niklas.enbom@webrtc.org>
To:        Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com>
Cc:        ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Jan Linden <jan.linden@webrtc.org>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, chromium@freebsd.org, gecko@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Making WebRTC available for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <CAHzHjDP9PhT%2B=qfdzBJ-snEKRriXAhKg2Oc9YLKRBC7BDc6Cag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BWntOuY7E%2B__KVPP%2BHJ6QjT6YhAa0rFfFPROFrcfyDmTLRHXA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CA%2BWntOuY7E%2B__KVPP%2BHJ6QjT6YhAa0rFfFPROFrcfyDmTLRHXA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey guys, not sure what this refers to. The G+ post talks about porting the
gtalk plugin to freeBSD. WebRTC is an effort in the opposite direction (no
plugins needed). Afaik there is a Chromium build for freeBSD that should
support WebRTC (unless it's disabled at build).

Niklas


On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://plus.google.com/110946378055202199166/posts/8iTsSCatk4x
>
> The process has been started :
> http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=44691
>
> Dependencies needed- referenced in "howto" and webrtc dependencies:
> libbrlapi from brltty.
>
>
> Benefits: Native client and sever side of WebRTC applications for FreeBSD
> and possibly other BSDs.
> Eliminated dependency for Linuixlator based applications thus cutting down
> on hardware resource use.
> Eliminated need for other simulated and emulated programs to run Skype or
> other voice-and-video binaries. I.e. Wine, VirtualBox, qemu, et cetera, et
> al.
>
> Since it is known that Sony's PS4 uses FreeBSD as the basis for its OS,
> WebRTC could be implemented as a native application on the platform/console
> thus allowing users to communicater in real time while gaming.
>
>
> Why am I proposing this?
> 1. Adrian Chadd asked on Google+ and nowhere else. I decided to bring his
> proposal to the public and attempt an initial starting phase.
> 2. Users would not be limited to having only a few selected operating
> systems at their disposal. Developers could easily communicate with each
> other.
> 3. Real time sharing/viewing of conventions. This would give the community
> another window into the development of FreeBSD.
> 4. Companies such as IxSystems and Sony would be able to contact develoers
> while simultaneously working on a FreeBSD/FreeBSD_based system.
> 5. FreeBSD developers would be able to give feedback on the development of
> WebRTC sources.
>
>
>
> Being that I am limited on resources, is it possible that others could
> take over what was started?
>
>
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHzHjDP9PhT%2B=qfdzBJ-snEKRriXAhKg2Oc9YLKRBC7BDc6Cag>