From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 19 11:11:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09405 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:11:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wcc4.wcc.net (wcc4.wcc.net [208.6.232.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA09383 for ; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:11:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from piquan@wcc.net) Received: from detlev.UUCP (96.camalott.com [208.203.140.96]) by wcc4.wcc.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA23217; Tue, 19 May 1998 13:07:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08275; Tue, 19 May 1998 13:09:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from joelh) Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 13:09:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199805191809.NAA08275@detlev.UUCP> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: jahan@pc.jaring.my, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <10285.895559215@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: Undefined symbol "___error" From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.org References: <10285.895559215@time.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> I never wanted any experimental ones, we want >> reliability,robustness and correctness. I was following cvsup. [snip] > Quite seriously: Unless you follow this advice exactly and to the > letter, I cannot even come close to assuring that you will have any > "reliability, robustness or correctness" at your site. I thought that was the idea behind -stable? -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message