From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 8 09:05:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7000A106566B; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219038FC1C; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B841FFC22; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1434A844C6; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:05:35 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Alexander Leidinger References: <55861270658151@web135.yandex.ru> <4BBD68DB.7050600@yandex.ru> <201004080727.21020.bruce@cran.org.uk> <4BBD7CDC.2070505@yandex.ru> <20100408103809.13496s9i6ny03ocg@webmail.leidinger.net> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:05:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100408103809.13496s9i6ny03ocg@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:38:09 +0200") Message-ID: <867hoi8gbl.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Bruce Cran , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org, Teske , Randi Harper , "Andrey V. Elsukov" , Devin@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:05:36 -0000 Alexander Leidinger writes: > Please consider using SVN instead. A lot more users will be able to > check out from there. We don't grant non-committers access to the Subversion repo. > It looks like other people had a look at sysinstall, not at sade. As > sysinstall is supposed to be used at installation time, and the intent > for sade was to offer the functionality (or more) of the part of > sysinstall which is useful after installation (and to prevent admins > from using sysinstall after the installation to prevent some unwanted > foot-shooting), I do not think that we need to think about a strong > lock between sysinstall and sade. Yes we do. Otherwise we'll just end up back where we are today, where if you want anything more complicated than a single-disk install you have to drop into the fixit shell and do it manually before running the installation procedure. Anythig that sade can do, we want sysinstall to do as well, and we don't want to implement everything twice. My suggestion is to add a "sysinstall mode" to sade where it operates under certain (minor) constraints and reports what it did in a format that sysinstall can parse, so sysinstall can just fork-exec sade instead of duplicating the code. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no