From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May  5 22:33:21 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA09826
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 22:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA09793
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 May 1998 22:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id FAA09539; Wed, 6 May 1998 05:59:26 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199805060359.FAA09539@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Development Projects
To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de (Wolfram Schneider)
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 05:59:26 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19980505231620.27104@panke.de> from "Wolfram Schneider" at May 5, 98 11:16:01 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > In order to avoid confusion, i suggest to classify items depending
> > on their status (and the availability of working code or a clean
> > patch for 2.2.X or 3.0 is a useful metric that should not offend
> > anyone).
> 
> I don't have the time to do that. 

let's hope someone can do that...

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message