Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:27:05 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cx_lowest on 9 Message-ID: <20120926142705.GA1072@mycenae.sbb.rs> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1s2K6ZdDU0tWQv13YMjuRk_PR5jdrovUxy1aFmAJkpzVg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120925154413.GA1234@mycenae.sbb.rs> <CAN6yY1s2K6ZdDU0tWQv13YMjuRk_PR5jdrovUxy1aFmAJkpzVg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No news on the schedule, but with 9.1 Beta, the code has finally been
> fixed to deal with several issues and the correct answer is:
> performance_cx_lowest="Cmax"
> economy_cx_lowest="Cmax"
> And, no, I don't recall where it is documented
Thanks for answer!
I found the thread regarding this topic. Just as you
said. This "Cmax" is somehow contraintuitive to me.
I'd expected "Cmin", but it is me, I assume.
Cannot recall when I was so nervous waiting release
in the branch.
Best regards
Zoran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120926142705.GA1072>