From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 25 14:08:47 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E9916A41F
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:08:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from paul.butler@tdbanknorth.com)
Received: from tdbanknorth.com (mail4.tdbanknorth.com [12.15.146.26])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410EF43D70
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:08:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from paul.butler@tdbanknorth.com)
Message-ID: <7E62107FEEDDCC42B8A01A9A12A557142A5872@me6awmail04.bkng.net>
From: "Butler, Paul" <Paul.Butler@tdbanknorth.com>
To: "'freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:04:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: i386 support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:08:47 -0000

Christer Hermansson wrote:

 

> Hi.

>

> FreeBSD 6.0R don't support 386 processors according to the release

> notes, maybe it's time to change the name of the i386 platform to the 

> x86 platform.

>

>

Do you realize how many things depend on the platform name being i386? 

Just thinking of ports alone, I cound probably name a "few." Not very 

important, but a huge hastle to switch over.

 

-Frank

 

I believe the issue here is one of the accepted nomenclature currently in
use in the industry, although it is not completely accurate.  This is
because "i-386" is often used to refer to all the processing chips using
successors to the 386 instruction set, even though very few installations
actually employ a true 386 chip.  FreeBSD needs to keep its terminology
consistent with other operating systems ported to the same "Intel-based"
technology, and in this context retaining the "i-386" designation makes
sense because all of us whose responsibility includes 32-bit Pentium family
hardware can immediately identify which version of FreeBSD (or the kernel)
is the one for use on these machines.

 

Paul Butler