From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 13:49:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCA6106566B; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2678FC0C; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JDnlHE030650; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:49:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JDnlOx030647; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:49:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 07:49:47 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthias Apitz In-Reply-To: <20120519085444.GA2966@tinyCurrent> Message-ID: References: <4FB6B713.7080807@FreeBSD.org> <20120519085444.GA2966@tinyCurrent> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-902635197-829386930-1337435387=:30455" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 07:49:47 -0600 (MDT) Cc: User Wojtek , Dimitry Andric , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: proper newfs options for SSD disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:49:49 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---902635197-829386930-1337435387=:30455 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 19 May 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Saturday, May 19, 2012 a las 10:40:32AM +0200, User Wojtek escribió: > >>> You may be able to find the exact erase block size in the technical >>> documentation of your specific SSD. But the manufacturers don't always >>> tell. :) >>> ... > > Hi, > > Some weeks ago in the context of Openmoko (my Linux based cellphone) > I came across to this very interesting article about file systems and > SSD; even if the article is in Linux context, it contains useful > information about how SSD behaves when updating blocks on SSD. > > https://lwn.net/Articles/428584/ That's an excellent article. It mentions a flashbench tool which can help determine data for a particular SSD: git://git.linaro.org/people/arnd/flashbench.git I haven't tried it yet. ---902635197-829386930-1337435387=:30455--