From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 7 9:32:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.du.gtn.com (mail.du.gtn.com [194.77.9.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5F337B479 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:32:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely.de [194.231.9.142]) by mail.du.gtn.com (8.11.0.Beta3/8.11.0.Beta3) with ESMTP id eA7HWio00548 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified OK); Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:32:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [fec0::104:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1) with ESMTP id eA7HWWj14191 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified NO); Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:32:35 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eA7HWVY00612; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:32:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:32:31 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: John Polstra Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is sockstat broken in -stable? Message-ID: <20001107183231.A593@cicely5.cicely.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from jdp@polstra.com on Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:18:01AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:18:01AM -0800, John Polstra wrote: > On a -stable system from October 31, I'm seeing this from sockstat: > > Userland and kernel are in sync. This is on an Alpha, though I > don't know whether that's significant or not. Is anybody else > seeing this problem? It does not work on 4.1-RELEASE alpha too. Only differences is that there are no '?' printed. I can't speak for current because my world is not in sync. i386 current works. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message