From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 21:19:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F451065691 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C008FC44 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [92.117.200.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F518A000A; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:19:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496FA85C.1010109@bsdforen.de> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:19:24 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <18798.1525.541314.409491@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <496E4525.8010500@bsdforen.de> <18798.24182.492454.229881@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18798.24182.492454.229881@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl upgrade question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:19:57 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Dominic Fandrey writes: > >> > Having gotten that far, I've got 40+ files - or at >> > least directories - in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8. Most >> > have the ".pm" extension, with a few ".so", ".bs", and ".packlist" >> > thrown in. No ".ph" >> > Am I in trouble? And if so, what next? >> > >> For portupgrade: >> # find /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 -type f -exec pkg_info -W \{} \; | grep -Eo '[^ ]+$' | sort -u | xargs -o portupgrade -f >> >> Afterwards there shouldn't be anything left belonging to a package. > > Once I have done this - and it appears to run successfully - is > it safe to delete the 5.8.8 directories? > > > Robert Huff You should first check what is left there. There might be a whatis file and a couple of empty directories. In that case it's safe to delete the stuff. If there's any more there, it depends on your own judgement, or ask someone about it.