From owner-freebsd-hubs Tue Jan 20 17:50:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA28671 for freebsd-hubs-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:50:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA28666 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:50:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA02570; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:50:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199801210150.RAA02570@austin.polstra.com> To: Garrett Wollman cc: gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu, hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: need for another cvsup site? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jan 1998 20:31:31 EST." <199801210131.UAA15644@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:50:06 -0800 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > $ gzip -dc /var/log/cvsupd.log.0.gz | wc -l > 225 Thanks, that was quick. Here's the same thing on cvsup.freebsd.org. (The logs are rotated daily there.) > opus:/usr/users/jdp> gzip -dc /var/log/cvsupd.log.0.gz | wc -l > 2361 I'd say you're not getting your fair share of the business. :-) > Speaking of which, would it not be better to have this machine be > `cvsup1.freebsd.org', and have the main `cvsup.freebsd.org' be a > ``shuffle'' record pointing to all three? That should balance the > load far better. Yes, that would be a lot better. You simply give cvsup.freebsd.org three A records, and then the DNS system round-robins the order of them in each response, right? John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth