From owner-cvs-all Thu Mar 19 07:22:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA03599 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 07:22:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hda.hda.com (hda-bicnet.bicnet.net [208.220.66.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA03540 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 07:22:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dufault@hda.hda.com) Received: (from dufault@localhost) by hda.hda.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24204 for committers@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:21:15 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199803191521.KAA24204@hda.hda.com> Subject: "backing out" changes To: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:21:14 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I've noticed the OID_AUTO in sysconf, and I've switched the p1003.1b stuff to use that. I don't know how I missed this when I first did this a year ago. This means that the recent changes in sys/sysctl.h and lib/libc/gen/sysconf.c are bad and are undone locally. When I see people saying that they are "backing out changes" are they simply overwriting the changes they made or are they doing something else? Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime development, Machine control, HD Associates, Inc. Safety critical systems, Agency approval To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message