From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 31 10:12:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA21262 for current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 10:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA21253 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1) id 0wtymC-0002jm-00; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 11:12:36 -0600 To: Chuck Robey Subject: Re: core group topics Cc: FreeBSD current In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jul 1997 18:49:25 EDT." References: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 11:12:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message Chuck Robey writes: : 1) Satoshi's new Makefile. His makefile has been around plenty long : enough for testing, and while several people have reported good results, : I've seen no negatives reported at all. Will it get ignored or committed? Heck, you have commit privs, so you could do it yourself :-). That's what I've been doing with the OpenBSD security fixes, just doing it when I have time, and backing things out that escape my testing procedures. Granted this is a bigger deal thing than my stuff. : ELF If we do this, we should do it in 3.0. That's the perfect time because all the libraries are changing major numbers (or most) and people would expect much disruption. This would be a major diff between 2.2.x and 3.x. Heck, at least integrate it into the tree and make it possible to build the new stuff with a DOELF=yes in /etc/make.conf. That is the next logical step, no? Warner