From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Mar 7 13:27:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from bolet.ens.fr (bolet.ens.fr [129.199.99.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08764151CE for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 13:27:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pornin@bolet.ens.fr) Received: (from pornin@localhost) by bolet.ens.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA07625; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 22:22:02 +0100 Message-ID: <19990307222202.A7614@bolet.ens.fr> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 22:22:02 +0100 From: Thomas Pornin To: Dmitrij Tejblum Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird problems References: <199903071810.VAA63245@arc.hq.cti.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <199903071810.VAA63245@arc.hq.cti.ru>; from Dmitrij Tejblum on Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 09:10:25PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 09:10:25PM +0300, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > I am still very confused. Am I the first man who ever tried to install > 19990206-SNAP? Anyone build world without any optimization, right? I installed 19990206-SNAP, and made a standard world, and I am pretty sure it was with -O, and sh, nm, rm work. I do have problems with some utilities (dmesg, kvm_mkdb, netstat -r,...) if I recompile a kernel too different from the generic one (I could add softupdates without this problem, though). My machine is a UDB (cpu is 21066 I guess). --Thomas Pornin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message