Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:34:37 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: all mutexes -> read-write locks? Message-ID: <6571.1212428077@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:14:10 -0400." <Pine.GSO.4.64.0806021300290.3976@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.GSO.4.64.0806021300290.3976@sea.ntplx.net>, Daniel Eischen wri tes: >It doesn't, it shows one reason why mutexes can be different >than read/write locks. Agreed. There is no easy way to determine which mutexes can be rw_locks, so take the correct route: education. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6571.1212428077>