From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 09:52:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5C716A41F for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1992D43D49 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2006 09:52:24 -0000 Received: from cable194106210-142.astral.lodz.pl (EHLO [192.168.0.207]) [194.106.210.142] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 29 Mar 2006 11:52:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <442A58D6.5060208@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:52:22 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060128) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Meyer References: <4429831E.902@gmx.de> <4429831E.902@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: gerald@pfeifer.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/gcc41 - rc.d script X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:52:27 -0000 Dirk Meyer wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>> I think "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/gcc41.sh" should not be used on 6.0 and >>> higher, since ldconfig_compat (see "/etc/rc.d/ldconfig") already >>> provides a mechanism for that in the base system. > > Gerald Pfeifer schrieb:, >> Let me Cc: Dirk on this, who proposed this mechanism and with who >> we discussed a general solution going forward. > > Please see: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/ldconfig > > This it is not in any released codebase yet. > and I found very less documentation on it. > > As a workaround there is a loconfig_compat port, > but this installs a similar script in $PREFIX/etc/rc.d > > using this solution would require more testing. > > kind regards Dirk > Well, then here are my test results: it works fine. Since you say it's not in 6.0 I'd suggest this for 6.1 and higher. I hope others will test it as well and report that it works fine.