From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 1 17:57:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA08791 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA08782 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id AAA27000; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 00:57:34 GMT Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 09:57:34 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock Reply-To: Michael Hancock To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: vm questions In-Reply-To: <20040.838930488@critter.tfs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > There are no plans for a lite-3 that I know of right now. Kirk is doing > >consulting work for BSDI and is working on some FFS related performance > >issues. > > I asked him directly, and his answer was a very convincing no. Is the traditional BSD release engineering going to be carried on? Remember, 4.4 was a new feature release that is assumed to need fixing. Lite-2 was a "let's do what we can with the remaining budget" and it doesn't come close to a 4.5. 2.2 looks like it'll be more of a new feature release, so I guess we could get back to the fix release in the 2.3 time frame. Arggh! Never mind. Mike Hancock