From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Nov 7 14:10:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA15716 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 7 Nov 1998 14:10:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.camalott.com (mail.camalott.com [208.203.140.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA15711 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 1998 14:10:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-38.camalott.com [208.229.74.38]) by mail.camalott.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA15436; Sat, 7 Nov 1998 16:10:26 -0600 Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA18090; Sat, 7 Nov 1998 16:09:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from joelh) To: Jamie Howard Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: From NTK... References: From: Joel Ray Holveck Date: 07 Nov 1998 16:09:32 -0600 In-Reply-To: Jamie Howard's message of "Sat, 7 Nov 1998 16:17:46 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: <86sofvqhnm.fsf@detlev.UUCP> Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> What are vants? > From http://alife.santafe.edu/alife/topics/cas/ca-faq/types/types.html > The Vant rule, by Chris Langton, describes the path of an ant who > starts pointing in a certain direction. [snip] > They totally rule and are really fun to watch when set up with random > configurations. I wanted to implement an LKM screen-saver using them, but > never got around to it. I'll have to check this out. And the author devised a calculus to handle analyze them? Cheers, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message