Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:45:11 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>, avg@freebsd.org, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, decke@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please test your commits Message-ID: <4F3A7377.5010406@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwMrBBkBPpLo0sbCY_rFtb=-PMX5ymWWhE8b31JdXtTTNQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGFTUwMrBBkBPpLo0sbCY_rFtb=-PMX5ymWWhE8b31JdXtTTNQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/14/12 08:40, b. f. wrote: >> On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >>> On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>> on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following: >>>>> On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely >>>>>> recommend it. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, but it is not without its problems. I tried testing math/sage >>>>> on >>>>> redports.org. It reported an error building the dependency >>>>> math/atlas, which >>>>> built fine on mine and other people's systems. >>>> >>>> But still this is an instance of environment where the port can >>>> fail, so it >>>> warrants an investigation and fixing. Either in the port or in the >>>> redports >>>> infrastructure. >>> >>> Yes, you are correct. In fact, in the case of math/atlas there is >>> the following report. It looks like people are working on it. >>> >>> >>> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=math&portname=atlas&wildcard= >> >> I think this isn't directly related. The build on redports had status >> "dud" in >> math/atlas which means the port has set IGNORE. I have no good way of >> telling which >> IGNORE line it is yet but it can only be one of: >> >> You have set WITH_ARCHDEF, but have not defined ARCHDEF >> You must select at least one of WITH_SHARED and WITH_STATIC >> >> both sound strange. > > There is nothing strange about them: they just indicate errors arising > from invalid choices of OPTIONS. The build is more likely to be > broken by MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD, which uses IGNORE. That would explain the problems I am having. I'll quit trying to test sage on redports.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3A7377.5010406>