From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 12:56:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E7737B401 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CC943F85 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:56:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23](untrusted sender)) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <200307091956510150077cdue>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:56:51 +0000 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Morton Lin In-Reply-To: <002d01c3462a$a3a81be0$c40a27ca@morton> Message-ID: <20030709125551.M4273@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <002d01c3462a$a3a81be0$c40a27ca@morton> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ponomarew@oberon.net cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/foo/nut conflict ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 19:56:53 -0000 On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Morton Lin wrote: > Hi, Sir : > > There were two named "nut" ports in the ports tree. I objected to this at the time, and was told it wasn't a big deal. > 1) ports/misc/nut/ > (from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/misc.html I saw > its name should be "health-nut-8.8" or something > like that ? ) > 2) ports/sysutils/nut/ > > Should we make some differences between them ? > > BTW, ports gd2 was already upgraded by maintainer. > Is there any plan to upgrade ports/sysutils/nut to fix > the "make cgi" broken problem? The last time I tried this with a new version, it still didn't work. They are releasing new versions of nut with a fairly high regularity, so I'm still trying them to find one that works. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection