Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:44:48 +0100 From: "Mark Hobden" <markhobden@gmail.com> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page Message-ID: <c57a76300606071344p127709bh7a05dafec5609c4f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <op.tascgccf9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <c57a76300606070133r37e95b23tff6dda96c74b3a93@mail.gmail.com> <op.tascgccf9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:33:25 -0500, Mark Hobden <markhobden@gmail.com> > wrote: > > My request would be for portupgrade to include an option that runs > > through every port it wants to upgrade first and runs 'make config', > > so it does not get stuck half way through an unattended upgrade > > waiting for options. > > This "portupgrade -m 'config-recursive'" doesn't work? I never use this -m > option, so I have no idea if it will working with config(-recursive). I believe the command just appends config-recursive to the make command: make config-recursive PORT_UPGRADE=yes -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER reinstall So if I run: portupgrade -m 'config-recursive' -a I believe I could still get stuck on a config screen after it has spent some time upgrading the first few ports. -- Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c57a76300606071344p127709bh7a05dafec5609c4f>