Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:05:17 +0530 From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@hserus.net> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/95541: /usr/ports/net/djbdns WITH_IPV6 queries ip6.int Message-ID: <4439C465.1090705@hserus.net> In-Reply-To: <200604091250.k39CoGMb096492@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200604091250.k39CoGMb096492@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Update Seems related to this thread - http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=djbdns&m=112545401005912&w=2 > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:50:59PM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: >> I noticed that I was dropping some DNS responses at my firewall, >> and found that (perhaps not surprisingly) dns_transmit.c thinks >> all ports between 1025 and 65535 are valid. On FreeBSD, it >> would be nice if it consulted the sysctl MIB for valid port ranges. >> Typically: >> >> net.inet.ip.portrange.first: 1024 >> net.inet.ip.portrange.last: 5000 >> net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 49152 >> net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65535 > > (Warning: untested hack follows.) > > First apply > > http://www.catnook.com/patches/djbdns-1.05-sendports.patch > > and rebuild/reinstall dnscache. Then stick > > echo "$(sysctl -n net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst):$(sysctl -n \ > net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast)" > /service/dnscache/env/SENDPORTS > > in /service/dnscache/run. Restart dnscache. > > -- > Jos Backus > jos at catnook.com FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Thank you very much for your problem report. > It has the internal identification `ports/95541'. > The individual assigned to look at your > report is: freebsd-ports-bugs. > > You can access the state of your problem report at any time > via this link: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=95541 > > >>Category: ports >>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >>Synopsis: /usr/ports/net/djbdns WITH_IPV6 queries ip6.int >>Arrival-Date: Sun Apr 09 12:50:16 GMT 2006
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4439C465.1090705>