From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 13 16:20:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF5616A4CE; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:20:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (dsl390.iae.nl [212.61.63.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF32043D55; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from dual (dual [212.61.27.71]) by freebee.digiware.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5DGEk67078388; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:14:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Message-ID: <023d01c45161$8f486360$471b3dd4@dual> From: "Willem Jan Withagen" To: Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:14:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: anybody using net-snmp on AMD64 or other 64bit platforms?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:20:27 -0000 Reason I ask, is that it crashes with me at all kinds of places... I've started looking at the warnings from a regular make. And in the process of tryin to fix those there are a lot of places where typeconversions are really messed up. int, size_t, I32, function addresses and pointers are all intermixed. And this of course will create all kinds unwanted effects.... Are there any suggestions as to enhance portability this way... eg. what kind of generic pointer type would one use to make shure that pointers are the correct size on both architectures.... Or as a side questions: Are there other snmp-daemons that run on 64bit platforms?? --WjW