From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 20:52:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A62106564A for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404928FC15 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com ([10.2.2.95]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7OKqVGg021504; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:52:15 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: funny ECMP Thread-Index: ActDzA9SGBrLZNP2QhKCgdUU5sEPZgAAW5NA References: From: "Li, Qing" To: "Ingo Flaschberger" Cc: Qing Li , net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: funny ECMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:52:33 -0000 >=20 > > Sure, but such a configuration did not make much sense. >=20 > Why not? > Use CARP and OSPF and you have such a configuration. >=20 Okay, I will try that. >=20 > I hoped, that now, as freebsd has multi-route support (as other unix > really have for a long long time) everything would be easier. >=20 > But multipath support of freebsd is in my opinion, in a "experimental" > state. >=20 Yes, agreed. =20 It will be in the experimental state until there is varied and sufficient usage. =20 So now I will make improvement to the implementation based on your=20 usage scenario and feedback. Thank you. -- Qing