From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 18 15:12:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 516E5B63;
 Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru
 [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183B51A80;
 Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown
 [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:3815:a891:65b8:fb7e])
 (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
 by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D05944AC34;
 Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:12:08 +0400 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:12:03 +0400
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1172266612.20140418191203@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: amd(8) doesn't work in 10 and CURRENT (does auromound(8) support NFS?)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:12:15 -0000

Hello, Freebsd-net.

 I'm trying to use amd(8) with default config & map for "classic" task:
access NFS shares without explicit "mount" commands (which need "sudo").

 And it seems, that amd(8) is completely broken. It dumps core after 1-2
minutes of working with amd-mounted share (and NFS client complains on
timeouts after that).

 Is it known problem? Does somebody use amd(8) these days?

  Does new "automound(8)", which "compatible with its counterparts in OS X,
Solaris, and Linux" support NFS?

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>