From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 18:02:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0418937B401 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from community8.interfree.it (community8.interfree.it [213.158.72.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E45843FBF for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:02:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: (qmail 20360 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2003 01:02:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO linux) (80.104.113.229) by mail.interfree.it with SMTP; 25 Apr 2003 01:02:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: ".VWV." To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 02:03:28 -0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200304250203.28738.victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> Subject: ufs and ext X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:02:56 -0000 Hi to all. I have noticed both BSD and Linux pre-compiled kernels cannot mount read-= write=20 the other filesystem. It's a shame that a newbie could think one is able = to=20 read, the other one is able to write. We know ufs was born before ext. So= me=20 Linux distributions has also adopted ReiserFS on Linux, that's really a=20 not-unix filesystem. Why at PASC nobody has declared what's the best=20 standard? I'm waiting for God's reply... With my best regards VITTORI