Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:06:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 188990] [xen] dhclient(8) does not accept DHCP Offer on FreeBSD 10 as Xen DomU Guest Message-ID: <bug-188990-23905-wrEOXhBPeC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-188990-23905@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-188990-23905@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D188990 --- Comment #14 from Bhavesh Davda <bhavesh.davda@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Roger Pau Monn=C3=83=C2=A9 from comment #8) I looked at the proposed patch to the netfront driver, and think this introduces a semantic mismatch between the meaning of the 'NETRXF_data_validated' rx->flag between the netback driver in dom-0 and the netfront driver in the FreeBSD dom-U. Basically 'NETRXF_data_validated' says (from the equivalent CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY Linux skbuff flag that the Linux dom-0 netback driver = uses for this): * CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY: * * The hardware you're dealing with doesn't calculate the full checksum * (as in CHECKSUM_COMPLETE), but it does parse headers and verify checks= ums * for specific protocols. For such packets it will set CHECKSUM_UNNECESS= ARY * if their checksums are okay. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-188990-23905-wrEOXhBPeC>