From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 13 16:16:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9FBF143; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C3702B7C; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q58so11453786wes.21 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:16:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MQJje2FpF5csHR0aPoDOVIDA5PNu9LE7P19o4xUKCms=; b=fxOKcJTM2gB18EC10qrFuTMHmixsQQQ5c7ER1MrlHYrI7T2U11iN6rBvsOBQKtXWwc lgK6HvwKdw0yJXhGD0mpli9Mr/TRwjwOh5KBB9+AhIX1NSdox7XrzeRVffbbeF257bu1 5fOQ+muYD6cSZ4/mKj9VZA9CzZgvNxVv/uy7Noirz2deCZxQvdqo2/UwBwoxmVLz9HHF O2jPUUqvH1HPWhrlFcxpLqRPdRwr3DCb6sbIIea5p+rrc1I5cLnUwnDbOQpF2oe72vML +0ykjFztXJoboRx91csr0KsT6it05nk1YKxL5GzzyBhtPou79OiPcoVRAVCJ3asThkrE 5d5A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.108.41 with SMTP id hh9mr5383594wjb.68.1407946587360; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.24.165 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:16:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17051586.gQbKyLmFOD@lumiwa.farms.net> References: <20140813123926.3354a660@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <17051586.gQbKyLmFOD@lumiwa.farms.net> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:16:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: redports and build status From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: ajtiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Tijl Coosemans , =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=C3=B6hlich?= , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:16:30 -0000 On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Ajtim wrote: > On Wednesday 13 August 2014 17:11:28 Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrot= e: >> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:49:31 +0200 Bernhard Fr=C3=B6hlich wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Tijl Coosemans wr= ote: >> >>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:38:27 +0200 Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: >> >>>> I built a port in redports and I received a mail notifying that the >> >>>> builds were finished, but it seems redports couldn't figure out if = the >> >>>> builds finished successfully. >> >>>> >> >>>> https://redports.org/buildarchive/20140812170901-30860 >> >>> >> >>> Any ideas of why this happened? >> >>> >> >>>> Thanks in advance. >> >>> >> >>> I'm seeing a lot of these as well. CCing decke@ >> >> >> >> Yeah, the "finished" state is some rescue state in case something wen= t >> >> terribly wrong. Usually this happens when something inside redports f= ails >> >> or some backend behaves very weird or if the port creates some very >> >> strange >> >> situation like a recursive dependency (which fills up a temporary >> >> partition and then fails). >> >> >> >> If only one of many jobs fails then chances are good that it is some >> >> redports weirdness. If many jobs fail (like in this case) and it is >> >> reproducible then the chances are good that your port is doing someth= ing >> >> very very bad. >> > >> > I'm seeing these on multiple unrelated ports and with trivial changes. >> > I've now cleared my redports tree, leaving only one unmodified port an= d >> > it still results in all 'finished'. Maybe redport's internal ports tr= ee >> > got corrupt or one of its cached packages? >> >> Mine is modified but nothing to do with dependencies or such. However >> this problem is reproducible. This is the port: >> >> https://redports.org/browser/fernape/lang/basic256?rev=3D30358 >> >> I don't see very bad things there or at least not compared with the >> previous revision which finished with "success" >> >> Can you think of anything I can try? I'm willing to help. I got used >> to run successfully tests in redports to attach them to my PR's and I >> don't want to update this port until it builds properly. >> >> Regards > > http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=3D22&t=3D44800&start=3D75 Sorry, but I don't see how that thread is related to this one... > > -- > ajtiM > -------- > http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa