From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  2 13:19:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1689716A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2004 13:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D5643D53
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2004 13:19:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 10E4A66CD1; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 13:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:19:41 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040202211941.GC90670@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20040130195143.GA93830@seatle.vredesdorp.nl>
	<20040201212348.GA24109@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20040202075512.GA54021@seatle.vredesdorp.nl>
	<200402020227.32815.kstewart@owt.com>
	<20040202204500.GA82776@seatle.vredesdorp.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040202204500.GA82776@seatle.vredesdorp.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: portsdb -U fails
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 21:19:54 -0000


--TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:45:00PM +0100, r t g tan wrote:
> > Then why not quit banging you head on a wall and use "make index". Your=
=20
> > failure to adapt is spamming the list. Portsdb -U has not produced=20
> > totally clean INDEX runs since I can remember. Make index, on the other=
=20
> > hand, is currently producing clean makes.
> >=20
> > There are times when one doesn't work and the other does. You just have=
=20
> > to not refuse anything but ports/INDEX.
> >=20
> > Kent
> >=20
> > --=20
> > Kent Stewart
> > Richland, WA
> >=20
> > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
>=20
> make index fails as well with a bunch of make_index: no entrie messages.
>=20
> I guess Ill leave it at this waiting for it to get fixed.

It's not broken.  Please reread earlier advice given to you.

Kris

--TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAHr7tWry0BWjoQKURAudhAKCZH6bujqrX9eWbpa3I2Y8SkNAm8gCdHWEl
bLTmw1i11AQVTRylroC6LrQ=
=GYHX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg--