From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  8 06:27:13 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 10B4537B412; Tue,  8 Apr 2003 06:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spider.deepcore.dk
	(cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F180A43FAF; Tue,  8 Apr 2003 06:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) id h38DR9XC025406;
	Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:27:09 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soeren Schmidt <sos@spider.deepcore.dk>
Message-Id: <200304081327.h38DR9XC025406@spider.deepcore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20030408152227.60c38ce3.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:27:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL98b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: sos@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-all.c
	ata-all.hata-chipset.cata-dma.c ata-pci.c ata-pci.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 13:27:13 -0000

It seems Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> wrote:
> > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes:
> > > For metadata intensive operations in a softupdates world they seem to
> > > buy as much as a write-cache (without the drawbacks of a wc in the
> > > softupdates world)... at least on a SCSI system.
> > 
> > ATA != SCSI
> 
> Yes... so what's the problem with ATA & TQ?

Its borked at the moment.

> > Besides, enabling ATA tags automatically enables the write cache.
> 
> This can be changed...

No it cannot, requirement of the HW.

-Søren