Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:47:35 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which to bump for distfile location change? Message-ID: <20110727204735.GA47031@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20110726210324.GA18262@atarininja.org> References: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> <CADLo83_cCiPsCd1Tgo82naO1UfkynYgxZ0yY51soW_v-rJpiRA@mail.gmail.com> <20110726210324.GA18262@atarininja.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-Jul-26 17:03:24 -0400, Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: >> No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is. > >Chris is right but I don't want to give people the impression that is >the only time to bump PORTREVISION. Another way of looking at it is: Should a user who has the port successfully installed rebuild the port, even though the distfile version hasn't changed. --=20 Peter Jeremy --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4weWcACgkQ/opHv/APuIckRACgsHdoTob9CpQ5FOT+QTaEk4vW Hl8An3FHcAsaOPoMAkmmcvGTW/6eW8WC =SRgS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110727204735.GA47031>