Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:18:51 +0100
From:      Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bad code in rcorder(8) (Was: Re: New RCorder: abi loaded too late)
Message-ID:  <20060222141851.GA43749@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: <43FBC1E4.7020204@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20060217181842.GA21033@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <43F65A70.7080608@FreeBSD.org> <20060217234118.GA22643@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <43F67121.5080809@FreeBSD.org> <43F682F2.1020804@FreeBSD.org> <43F68611.7080602@FreeBSD.org> <20060219110732.GA12550@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <43F8ABC8.30005@FreeBSD.org> <20060221180440.GB2996@galgenberg.net> <43FBC1E4.7020204@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 05:44:04PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> 
> >> Divacky Roman wrote:
> >>> I tried running rcorder under valgrind and it showed me massive
> >>> leaks/double-frees etc. unfortunately I am not able to run valgrind on recent
> >>> 7-current (when I start it it just creates 2.8G coredump)
> 
> > Looks fine to me ...
> 
> I think the trick is to repeat your test with some bad stuff in the scripts.
> So, create some circular dependencies, and some other impossible conditions,
> then repeat the test.
 
yes... I tried running valgrind on circular dependancies... that showed some
mem leaks.... see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=91789, I got that
leaks when investigating this PR (iirc)
 
> Also, Divacky posted a PR with a start to cleaning up the code, might be
> worth some before and after on that.
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/93630

my patch doesnt solve any such problems. its just a little cleanup I did when
looking at the code.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060222141851.GA43749>