From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 18 16:14:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3359E1065679; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) Received: from mail.netconsonance.com (mail.netconsonance.com [198.207.204.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120CC8FC1F; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) Received: from [10.66.240.106] (public-wireless.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netconsonance.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6IGDw98076909; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:13:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netconsonance.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.938 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.938 tagged_above=-999 required=3.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, AWL=0.502] Message-Id: From: Jo Rhett To: Boris Samorodov In-Reply-To: <05440975@bs1.sp34.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:13:52 -0700 References: <20080701192524.GA13558@atarininja.org> <05440975@bs1.sp34.ru> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Wesley Shields Subject: Re: please commit 124993 for cfengine-2.2.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:14:01 -0000 > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:25:24 -0400 Wesley Shields wrote: >> I will take this one and get it addressed. The PR you are quoting >> has >> not been around long enough for a maintainer timeout, but the other >> PR >> you reference[1] has. I suspect this is not an acceptable >> condition to >> override the maintainer. On Jul 17, 2008, at 2:42 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Why is it not acceptable to override a maintainer? This port is not an > infrastructure port, the maintainer is way long unresponsive. I see > only one show-stopper: there is no patch (or PR) to change the > maintainer. cfengine-2.2.8 will be out very shortly, possibly within a week. At that time I will submit a patch that will include the maintainer change. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness