Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 02:40:06 -0600 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) To: bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is "immutable" supposed to be a good idea? Message-ID: <199603140840.CAA03991@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <199602180608.RAA29273@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote: >>If secure mode is something we turn on during the boot process, >You'd be really unhappy if we turned on secure mode :-). Really? How unhappy? I was planning on turning on secure mode on my new firewall before I connect it to the Internet for real. >I disagree. The problem is that the immutable flags are set by default >on systems that will never run in secure mode. Yes. that's a problem. I've run into that on all my installs so far. Also, the docs are kinda misleading about all this stuff.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603140840.CAA03991>