From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 13 23:46:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA21348 for current-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:46:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA21343 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:46:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id XAA03237 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:46:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.2/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id HAA20035; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 07:45:04 GMT Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 16:45:03 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock Reply-To: Michael Hancock To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs is too slow? In-Reply-To: <199611140629.WAA17689@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >VxFS (which you mention in the subject line and later) is not part of the > >agreement with Microsoft, and is not yet being ported to NT. > > I don't believe that the Volume manager has been ported yet either. Do > you mean that it will not be ported??? The deal with MS is about the Volume Manager Only. I talked to a VxFS engineer there and a Veritas WinNT product manager and speaking for themselves they are both keen on porting VxFS to WinNT. I didn't get a reply that sounded like a concrete decision to do VxFS though. Regards, Mike Hancock