From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 23 01:51:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C01316A4E0 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tyler@bleepsoft.com) Received: from zeus.lunarpages.com (zeus.lunarpages.com [216.193.211.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E600043D58 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:51:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tyler@bleepsoft.com) Received: from [24.240.211.104] (helo=[192.168.250.100]) by zeus.lunarpages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.52) id 1G4T9D-0005aT-BK for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:52:47 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) To: FreeBSD Hackers Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-38--781357085" From: "R. Tyler Ballance" Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:51:41 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - zeus.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bleepsoft.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Machine-dependent code extension? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:51:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-38--781357085 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed I'm just wondering, the machine-dependent assembly tied into the i386 kernel, that's all named ${FILENAME}., while in the arm/ kernel machine-dependent code is named ${FILENAME}.S, what's the difference? Or is there none, just a change in convention? Cheers, -R. Tyler Ballance --Apple-Mail-38--781357085 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEwtYvqO6nEJfroRsRAtnPAJ4vKG9cQ/vEerTH3p6qTaMK5N9S5QCfR42z xi8JOq2Pt4sQ2snp3+QDoow= =MVtj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-38--781357085--