Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:18:46 +0100 From: Dries Schellekens <gwyllion@ulyssis.org> To: ALeine <aleine@austrosearch.net> Cc: tech-security@NetBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: backporting GEOM to the 4.x branch Message-ID: <4225F576.7050604@ulyssis.org> In-Reply-To: <200503010320.j213KI8U047666@marlena.vvi.at> References: <200503010320.j213KI8U047666@marlena.vvi.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ALeine wrote: > Algebraic attacks on AES show that AES may indeed be broken sooner than > we would hope, at least according to the information at: > > http://www.cryptosystem.net/aes/ Please stop referring to this website. Sorry, but everybody in the field of cryptology, except Nicolas Courtois, agree that algebraic attacks on AES don't work. To quote Vincent Rijmen: "The XSL attack is not an attack. It is a dream." Please read * http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/112 * http://www.inria.fr/rrrt/rr-5251.html * Claus Diem also has a paper that proofs XL/XSL does not work, but it is not online. Cheers, Dries
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4225F576.7050604>