From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jan 17 5:59:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5102C14D0F for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 05:59:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it) Received: (from luigi@localhost) by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA53795; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:59:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from luigi) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200001171359.OAA53795@info.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Bandwidth limiting on Switch. In-Reply-To: from matt at "Jan 17, 2000 08:49:29 am" To: matt Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:59:22 +0100 (CET) Cc: Rowan Crowe , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm wondering, off topic a little bit, is there any plan to clean up (in > my opinion) ipfw, and perhaps give it a syslog level, or anything other > then logging to the system message buf? while plans and ideas might be there (including fair queueing in dummynet and statefulness in ipfw), some of this work needs more than some spare hours, and some other (code cleanup etc.) is extremely boring, so some support is really needed if you want to see them become reality not too far in time. cheers luigi -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- Luigi RIZZO, luigi@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522 . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) Mobile +39-347-0373137 -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message