From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue May 5 03:03:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2012D3940 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49GPg82RZ2z4Bkx for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 53BEE2D393E; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538292D393D for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49GPg817DSz4Bkw for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21CD16EDD for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04533FPw065142 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04533F5F065141 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:03:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246168] Ubuntu 20.04 QEMU Failure with nested FreeBSD bhyve Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 03:03:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bhyve X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: drum@graphica.com.au X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 03:03:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246168 --- Comment #3 from John Hartley --- Hi Rodney, thanks for looking at this bug report. Does your statement, "FreeBSD Bhyve does *not* support nested virtualizatio= n as a host" relate to this nested topology ? Layer 0 - FreeBSD with bhyve hypervisor (on Bare Metal with Intel VT-x VMX support) Layer 1 - FreeBSD with bhyve hypervisor (ie Guest of Layer 0, Host to Layer= 2) Layer 2 - FreeBSD or other OS Guest I ask as bhyve wiki: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve#Q:_Can_I_run_multiple_bhyve_hosts_under_VMwa= re_nested_VT-x_EPT.3F Indicates that there should be ability to run nested topology as per my example: Layer 0 - VMWare or KVM with VT-x EPT Layer 1 - FreeBSD with bhyve hypervisor (ie Guest of Layer 0, Host to Layer= 2) Layer 2 - FreeBSD or other OS Guest I am trying to get this model up and running, as I am wanting to test metri= cs collection from Layer 1 FreeBSD guest/host. Given scarcity of information I know that this is little off the beaten tra= ck, but I did find this example: https://github.com/Suhoy95/SNE-reports-2019-public/tree/4-LIA-2-xen-kvm whi= ch indicated that it had go similar nested topology going, but with Ubuntu 18.= 04 as Layer 0 rather than Ubuntu 20.04 as in my case. Thanks you. John Hartley. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=