From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 18 11: 4:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7078D37B401 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:04:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (adsl-66-123-232-98.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [66.123.232.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA9F43E91 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:04:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spadger@best.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A115727F; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:04:43 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Mikhail Teterin , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A workaround for the missing __stderrp? In-Reply-To: Message from Kris Kennaway of "Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:48:06 PST." <20021118074805.GA99883@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:04:43 -0800 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20021118190443.A115727F@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:06:54AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > Can The Right Way(TM), please, be introduced? Is not it ridiculous, > > that we can run the Linux binaries, but not our own -- of earlier > > revisions? > > As noted a number of times here, if you need to run old 3.x binaries > put COMPAT3X=yes in your /etc/make.conf and rebuild. Hmm. My copy of Applix came bundled with FreeBSD 4.1 Desktop Edition. It's somewhat less than entirely intuitive (at least, to me) that this is a 3.x binary. Regards, AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message