From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 12 00:16:10 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910F216A407;
	Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:16:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:16:07 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0612111535280.32258@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
	<20061211171115.GD311@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0612112259050.12159@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0612112259050.12159@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200612120816.07608.davidxu@freebsd.org>
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, "Arne H. Juul" <arnej@pvv.ntnu.no>,
	freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: close() of active socket does not work on FreeBSD 6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:16:10 -0000

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 06:34, Arne H. Juul wrote:
<snip>
> This is exactly the sort of issue that should be solved by the
> thread library / kernel threads implementation and not in every
> threaded application that needs it, in my view.
>
It should not be done in new thread library, do you want a bloat 
and error-prone thread library ? Instead if this semantic is really
necessary, it should be done in kernel.

>    -  Arne H. J.

David Xu