From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 14:55:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FE11065672 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0462F8FC16 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so7517323iyj.13 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.29.195 with SMTP id s3mr3636476icc.30.1305037886305; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tech304 (supranet-tech.secure-on.net [66.170.8.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm2867199ics.4.2011.05.10.07.31.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 May 2011 07:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <4DC8B14E.4050400@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:31:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "Mark Felder" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.50 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS) and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:55:55 -0000 On Tue, 10 May 2011 03:47:24 -0500, =C5=A0imun Mikecin = wrote: > FHS is Linux centric instead of trying to be useful to other non-Linux= = > UNIXes (like OpenGroup does). > We already have hier(7): Jeff, This might seem rather blunt/rude but honestly I don't foresee the FreeB= SD = project integrating with the FHS. The hier(7) layout has been a lot of = work and it's something the project really strives to standardize on. As= a = FreeBSD user, we've been used to "porting" applications to not only run = on = FreeBSD but also adhere properly to the hier(7) structure. But if the FH= S = wants to adopt hier(7) we won't complain.... Regards, Mark