From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Dec 16 03:39:20 1996
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA20273
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id DAA20268
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:39:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from baloon.mimi.com (sjx-ca37-04.ix.netcom.com [204.31.236.196]) by dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA20892; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:38:44 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by baloon.mimi.com (8.8.4/8.6.12) id DAA05771; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612161138.DAA05771@baloon.mimi.com>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <96Dec15.182413pst.177711@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> (message from Bill Fenner on Sun, 15 Dec 1996 18:24:10 PST)
Subject: Re: Mesa-2.0 pkgname?
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Does Mesa-2.0 really want to have a pkgname of mesa-2.0?  Previous
 * versions had pkgnames with capital M's, and the ports directory is
 * ports/graphics/Mesa.  It's kind of confusing, IMHO.

Yeah, seems like this thing is best known as "Mesa" and it fits to the
"really large package" (it has like 4 separate libraries in there)
requirement as described the handbook (section 18.2.5.10 now, I
think), so it probably should have kept as Mesa.

Satoshi