From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 21 7:32:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EEB37B401 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:32:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp-ext.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F49A43FB1 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:32:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2LFWIgO054748 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:32:18 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h2LFWIRx054747 for hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:32:18 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:32:17 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Build options for kernel modules Message-ID: <20030321153217.GA53518@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief answer from someone who has the information. As far as I can see, kernel modules should be built along with the kernel for the only reason of keeping their mutual interfaces in sync, has a source file defining such an interface changed. Is there currently no way to go further and affect a kernel module's built-in features with kernel config file options, besides modifying makefiles in /sys/modules? -- Yar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message