From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 19 11:16:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA09511
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 11:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA09506
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 11:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by mail.cdsnet.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA02227
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 11:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 11:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jaye Mathisen  <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: OpenBSD
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970619111331.18142K-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



Sheesh, how many people do they have working on that thing?  I was reading
the 2.1 release announcement, and shaking my head...

Of course, the "20 or more security fixes", w/o mentioning subsystems was 
amusing.  (Not doubting that they were fixed, only the tossing around of
unsubstantiated numbers).

Anybody running FreeBSD given it a shot just to see?  I  have been
thinking about it to see if it fixes my UFS problems that are seemingly
unrepairable.