From owner-freebsd-security Tue Dec 30 10:28:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA13647 for security-outgoing; Tue, 30 Dec 1997 10:28:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA13639; Tue, 30 Dec 1997 10:28:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA23131; Tue, 30 Dec 1997 19:24:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Mike cc: Wut!? , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , "UC Computer / Transbay.Net" , bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Two sources for system-cracking tools In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Dec 1997 11:44:23 EST." Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 19:24:54 +0100 Message-ID: <23129.883506294@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Mike writes: > >> Yeah, Rootshell.com isn't very good with his information, and there is a >> very simple explanation why .. (He runs linux!).. > >I'd like to think that one can think logically/analytically and present >accurate information, regardless of what OS s/he uses. Mike, you must be the only person who didn't see straight through the original email as a "Troll, Class 1A". He might as well have added ``Just see how buggy FreeBSD is HA HA HA'' at the end of it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."